Wednesday, July 29, 2015

Webs of Myth and Monstrosity

H.P. Lovecraft, The Whisperer in Darkness (Part 2)

The narrator weaves the rumors of the mi-go into the fabric of local superstition – the unknown forest animal, the frightened child, the insanity of hermits, the devil-fears of the Puritans, the fairy myths of the Scotch-Irish immigrants, and the myths of Native Americans.  Yet Wilmarth pushes the boundaries of the mythology even further, until its reach is truly planetary.  He refers to “those universal legends of natural personification which filled the ancient world with fawns and dryads and satyrs…” and remarks upon the Abominable Snowmen “who lurk hideously amidst the ice and rock pinnacles of the Himalayan summits.”  The meditations demonstrate Lovecraft’s profound grasp of the mental geography of folklore and fear.  



I think there is material for an interesting analysis of Lovecraft’s vision and representation of media, though I would need to revisit other stories to paint an adequate picture.  For the moment, though, note how the Brattleboro Reformer becomes involved in a debate over the reality of mysterious monsters to such an extent that Wilmarth remarks on how it “reprinted one of my long historical and mythological summaries in full.”  As the voice of the skeptic, Wilmarth represents rational discourse, thorough scholarship, and civil debate – and in Lovecraft’s Vermont people eat it up, making him something of a celebrity.  It’s a rather slow, ponderous world of information that Lovecraft describes, a far cry from the rushing image-rivers of our internet.  The stately progression of scholarship in the story culminates in an appropriate figure: Henry Wentworth Akeley, who is described as part of “a long, locally distinguished line of jurists, administrators, and gentlemen-agriculturalists.”  You know, just your average guy.

No comments:

Post a Comment